As the production of knowledge moves from a linear innovation model in an explanations-oriented world to a networked innovation model in a solutions-oriented world, the practice of design in engineering and industry and the practice of research in academia are getting closer and closer. This proximity is calling for a renewal of the debates on the nature of academic research, on the epistemology of design, and on the relationship between research and design. This is particularly challenging as we concentrate on the specific field of information systems. It is, also, mostly enlightening as we look into the philosophical groundings of both the design disciplines and action research. This chapter attempts to escort the reader in the examination of these issues. It starts with a brief characterization of the two main modes of knowledge production, followed by a debate on the relationships between research and design. It then puts forward a simple philosophical framework that will be used to put in perspective the designerly ways of knowing, their relationship with action research, and the resulting implications on information systems research. The chapter closes with the re-examination, under this new perspective, of some recent debates on topics such as the rigor vs relevance dilemma and the ethical dimension of action research in information systems.
Information Systems Action Research: An Applied View of Emerging Concepts and Methods, Springer, October 2006
Cited by
Year 2011 : 1 citations
Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., et al. (2011). Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.
Year 2010 : 3 citations
Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Sein, M. K. (2010). On Integrating Action Research and Design Research. Design Research in Information Systems. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol. 22, pp. 179-194. Springer.
Majgaard, G. (2010) Design-Based Action Research in the World of Robot Technology and Learning. Proc. 2010 Third IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 85-92.
Williams, B., & Figueiredo, J. (2010). Engineers and their practice: A case study. In Education Engineering (EDUCON), 2010 IEEE (pp. 531–535).
Year 2009 : 3 citations
Loebbecke, C. and Powell, P. (2009) Furthering Distributed Participative Design: Unlocking the Walled Gardens. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 21 (1), 77-106.
Perego, A. (2009) IS Performance Management Systems: La Prospettiva dell"Action Research, PhD Thesis, Dottorato di Ricerca in Sistemi Informativi Aziendali " XXI Ciclo, Libera Universita Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Carli, and Docotrat en Science de Gestion, Université de Paris, Dauphine.
Williams, B. and Figueiredo, J. (2009) Phase change in engineering knowledge production - from an academic to an entrepreneurial context. Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2009, Queensland, Australia, 20-23 July 2009.
Year 2007 : 3 citations
Melo, P. "Grupos Distribuídos, Tomada de Decisão e
Posições Individuais: Etapas de um Percurso", Tese de doutoramento, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra, 2007.
Sein, M. K., Rossik, M., and Purao, S. (2007) Exploring the Limits of the Possible. Scandinavian Journal od Information Systems, 19(2), 105-110.
Waller, P. A. "Extended Television: A Study of How Investigations of Use Can Inform Design Processes in Nursing Homes", PsychNology Journal, vol.5, No.2, 2007, pp. 105-132.
